Milani’s description of La Bruna discovery (translated)

From RIN 1891, p. 41 ff.

[Part Human (me), Part Machine (google) Translation]

“The discovery of this hoard took place by chance in the spring of 1890 at La Bruna[1] in the municipality of Castel Ritaldi, a few steps from the Tatarena ditch, almost in the center between Spoleto, Trevi and Todi, in the heart of Umbria.

“A farmer, hoeing the earth, first came upon the bar shown on plates 4-5, which in fact presents the trace of the hoe on the basin of the tripod, then found four asses of the type shown on plate 14 [Apollo/Apollo]. He immediately took them to his patron, a certain Mr. Francesco Venturi, and the latter, on the next day, that man found himself at the find spot, poking the ground and looking more closely.  He picked up all the other pieces that make up the treasure: that is, four other whole bars of aes signatum, two broken bars, plates 12-13, the piece of aes rude, plate 1, and four other libral asses, together with a few fragments of clay pots and some animal remains.

“The said Mr. Francesco Venturi brought the precious deposit to Rome, and showed it to the General Directorate of Antiquities and Fine Arts.  There those pieces were believed to be false, and a hoax; and the same erroneous judgment having been confirmed to Venturi also by a well-known Roman antiquarian, he returned dejected and turned back to his own country.

“Venturi retained the discredited objects until the end of November, when, having come into contact with the expert antiques dealer Mr. Giuseppe Pacini of Florence, could soon, and to his no small satisfaction, conclude the sale of the entire treasure. The merchant Pacini paid a large sum for it (about L. 9000 [equivalent to more than $18k today]), and he was not wrong to judge the find above suspicion. When he came to show it to me, I did not believe my eyes, seeing pieces of such extraordinary rarity, in such preservation, and with patina and such characters, as to leave no doubt about their authenticity.

“I was able to study this illustrious deposit in the short time it remained in the hands of the merchant Pacini; I took the photographs, slightly reduced, which served to the annexed photo-etchings, and had the casts of every single piece executed in the workshop of the R. Etruscan Central Museum, in anticipation of the further dispersion of the originals. Our Museum, due to lack of funds and the natural claims of Pacini, could no longer aspire to such a purchase. No later than early January, Mr. Pacini had found the buyer of the entire closet in the person of Dr. Tommaso Capo, a well-known lover of Rome, who has already begun the dispersion too, putting a part of it for sale in a public auction.

This is the true story of the discovery, and the ups and downs so far suffered by this hoard.

The fragments of the vase and the animal remains collected together with the pieces of aes grave were recovered by Mr. Giuseppe Pacini, following my expression of interest and sold by him to me. Shortly, I will exhibit them in the Central Etruscan Museum, together with the aforementioned casts; meanwhile I offer here the detailed description:

a) Two fragments of a large and robust dolio of primitive dish. The thickness varies from 0.027 to 0.035; the largest piece measures 0.09 X 0.21. The clay is almost black on the inside (soul) and reddish on the outside.

b) Band amphora loop (0.05 wide), attached to its mouth. It can be assumed that the mouth of the vessel had a centimeter diameter. 15 to 20. The clay is of an ashen-like fine mixture with a brick red outer coating.

e) Fragment of an ordinary black bucchero bowl, externally brownish, perhaps lid of the vase b; presumable diameter 0.15.

d) Fragment of the mouth of a midsized olla in ordinary red earth (thickness 0.07).

e) Bottom of a very fine yellowish earthenware vase, likely coming from a small olla or an Italo-Pelasgic cup.

f) Fragmentary femur of a horse.

g) Other leftovers of animal skeleton, and horse tooth.

“Here is the description of the seventeen monetary pieces that make up the actual treasure: …”

[1] La Bruna, about 11 kilometers from Spoleto, is a small place, with a church and an inn, which is marked on the military topographic map.


 

Interestingly Capo sent a catalogue of his collection this year to the Royal Numismatic Society:

Capture.JPG

Capture1.JPG


BECAUSE…

It was a sales catalogue and he wanted buyers:

Capo, Tommaso. 1891. Catalogo delle monete greche, romane, primitive, consolari, imperiali, italiane medievali, moderne possedute dal Dott. Tommaso Capo, che si venderanno al pubblico incanto per cura del Cav. Ortensio Vitalini, numismatico in Roma, a principiare dal 9 marzo. Roma: Tipografia A. Befani.

(Links to WorldCat entry)  And, thank goodness, the ANS has a copy and I will get to see that Tuesday.  More then I’m sure.

And of course he found them as Crawford in CHRR (16) reports that most of La Bruna is now in the Staatliche Museen zu Berlin…  BUT, Berlin is supposed to be in CRRO and at least some of these pieces aren’t there (Eagle/Pegasus for example).  Perhaps Berlin collection is not fully digitized?  One of the Anchor/Tripod type is online and it was acquired in 1940 from Haeberlin.  So perhaps Haeberlin was the primary buyer at the Capo auction?

Needs checking.


The report of Capo’s sale is in the same volume of RIN as Milani’s hoard report above!


Capo’s status/reputation as a dealer seems confirmed by this footnote.

The piece of gold glass found in Catania mentioned here should now be in the Ashmolean with the rest of the Wilshere collection.

But here he is described as a passionate numismatist and medical doctor.  But the context suggests pieces that passed through his hands may have been ‘improved’.

Sword and Scabbard, Design Variation (RRC 8/1)

La Bruna

The closest parallel for this ‘fancy’ terminus for the scabbard is Haberlin 1910: pl. 32.2

Capture.JPG

 

Capture.JPG

Haberlin 1910: 62

Capture.JPG

Haeberlin 1910: pl. 60

The Vienna and BM specimens are close to each other in rendering.  (Too close?!)

British Museum 1867,0212.7

Vienna FA 4170 

The bar of this type illustrated by Vecchi 2014 is very different in style indeed:

The Mazin find is so small the drawings don’t add much:

Capture.JPG

Still to be tracked down and checked: Ariccia 1848 and Velletri 1784


Fakes known in 1910

Capture.JPG

La Bruna Hoard (CHRR 16)

Complete Original Publication

PDF extract of just Milani’s text and plates

Some taster images so you can understand my excitement!

[Update 27-7-23: There are also nice photos of bars in Berlin in the 1888 catalogue!]

Capture
Capture1

He also records weights and tons over other details.  Gotta get in to the Italian so I can learn more about the horse bones and context of discovery.  Updates as I read are likely.  Mostly I decided to start digging when I read this in Bradley:

Capture
Capture1

I don’t believe these bars date to the Pyrrhic wars and I think we need to revisit a connection with the settlement of Spoletium as a colony post-1st Punic War….

Updated RRC 13 map

RRC13 map

Stuff that makes my map look different from other maps:

  • Gattiola “find” was an error in reporting, same as Romito Pozzuolo finds
  • Campobasso numbers are not consistently reported: at least two likely from general region seems responsible
  • It seems likely Fallani is part of Campania (?) and since we don’t have an actual count I just increased my dot size.

I am coming round to a date c. 295, but feel this does not mean we ought to completely throw out a connection–at least in terms of distribution, if not the actual impetus to strike–with the via Appia.

Like Bernard 2018: 153 (fig. 5.4), I’m relying on Vitale 1998 (if you need a PDF scan of the catalogue, happy to share with colleagues) and Burnett and Molinari 2015.

Likely Findspot number of specimens GPS coordinates used
Baselice 1 41.4, 14.966667
Benevento 1 41.133333, 14.783333
Campania (?), may be higher number if Fallani is part of this 4+ 41.105556, 14.213889
Campobasso (x 2) 2 or 3 41.566667, 14.666667
Foggia 1 41.464167, 15.546111
Romito Pozzuolo 1 43.121389, 11.955833
Mesange 2 40.566667, 17.8
Oppido Lucano 1 40.762849, 15.98752
Ponte Gini di Orentano 2 43.778889, 10.661944
Rocca S. Felice (Irpino) 1 40.95, 15.166667
Rossano di Vaglio 1 40.686241, 15.938469
S. Chirco Nuovo 4 40.683333, 16.083333
S. Giorgio Ionico 6 40.45, 17.366667
S. Maria C.V. 2 41.083333, 14.25
San Martino in Pensilis 3 41.866667, 15.016667
Sulmona 1 42.046817, 13.925673
Taranto 1 40.4709405, 17.2371455
Teano 2 41.2502785, 14.0700745
Torchiarolo 1 40.483333, 18.05
Valesio 2 40.512187, 18.034033
Vaste 2 40.050815, 18.3872637
Timmari 1 40.655278, 16.475833
M. Marzo (Sicily) 1 Not included
La Palma (Spain)
1 Not included

Also not shown:

Spain: J. Noguera, ‘La Palma – Nova Classis. A Publius Cornelius Scipio Africanus encampment during the Second Punic War in Iberia,’ Madrider Mitteilungen 53 (2012), 262-86 (I also didn’t map it).

A Poet’s Patron?

Capture

Would it change how we thought about the career of Marcus Valerius Messalla, suff. cos. 32 BCE and patron of Tibullus if he happened as a young man to have made such an anti regal coin (RRC 435/1)?  Messalla the patron and suffect consul was famously republican in character: it would be nice to have this as ‘proof’ of his early and outspoken leanings in that direction.

Old post on symbolism

Syme thought they could be the same person (JRS 1995: 157), Crawford allowed it:

Capture.JPG

The Digital Prosopography of the Roman Republic notes it but does not take it as fact.

Wikipedia gives a nice summary of the man but takes it as fact his father was cos. of 61 BCE, only noting that there are other suggestions.

Tarpeia, comparative Etruscan iconography

This cinerary urn from the Copenhagen Glyptotek got me thinking:

The catalogue interpretation is that is a variation of the fatal duel with spirit as judge, usually taken to be Eteocles and Polynices. That type is common enough (see image below), but this dual sarcophagus seems to show a different narrative (as catalogue notes) notice beard vs. beardless and all the different head gear.

However that spirit coming from the Rocks in that top picture sure looks a lot like Tarpeia in some depictions….

Capture1Capture

Just be clear I don’t think the winged figure is Tarpeia but she and her ilk may be the model for Tarpeia iconography. I think it is likely given the snake with the winged central figure that she is a spirit of a particular place.

4 July 2021:

This intaglio also has that same design feel.  Torso emerging from rocks or shields

Capture

Republican Silverware Weights

Capture3

This hoard of silver is Tivoli and thought to be late republican in date.

You can go see it in the Met in NYC.

My interest (today) is in the reported weights and the inscriptions on one of the two cups and the ladle as reported in:

Oliver, Andrew Jr. 1965. “Two Hoards of Republican Silver.” Bulletin of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, 23(5): pp. 176–77.

CaptureCapture1

So if we do some math and are a little less sure that Roman pound was 327 grams exactly this is what the objects tell us about the ball park of the Roman pound.

Capture2

I don’t know how much is likely to be worn away from polishing or chemical reactions over time.  Both factors.  Another factor is I’m not so sure on the resolution of the number II P(ondo) seems clear but then I see IIS (2.5?) and then four dots follows by SC VII.  Not sure how IIS plus for dots = 11 ounces….

The precision must be performative, not just ‘theft’ prevention.  (We don’t see shaving of coins in the republic or Roman world generally).  I’m guessing these pieces may have been part of dowry for which an exact value was recorded and that the recording of the weight on the object is part of the performance of the fulfillment of that obligation.

The pitcher (oinochoe) from the Arcisate Treasure is also thought to be Campanian manufacture and 1st Cent BCE and also has a woman’s name.  It’s 350 grams and claims to be precisely a pound (BM 1900,0730.4):

Another that is hard to transcribe:

Capture1Capture2CaptureCapture3Capture4Capture5

 

Bibliography on other silverware with weight inscriptions

Late antique plate in Getty with large disparity between inscribed weight and reconstructed weight.

This MET mirror (Campania?  1st Cent AD?) is supposed to have a weight and owner’s name inscription, but I cannot see it…, ILL-ed Bibliography…

Q. Iunius Rusticus’ Weight (and friends)

CaptureCapture1

Exhibition Catalogue write up

Some smart tweets from Gareth Harney

So I would LOVE to see Zilberstein and Ben-Efraim’s method of reconstructing original mass applied to this object.

It’s a 10 pound weight from Rome with the name of a well known historical figure that can be dated with in a decade or so.  Balsalt also is far more stable than most other materials so if we can determine its original volume and then mass we’d have a very good idea about what the official pound weighed in Rome at this time!

It is in the Allard Pierson Museum, University of Amsterdam


BM 1966,0328.18 seems to claim that it is an “official” weight from the Temple of Opes (Wealth), but if so it would give a very heavy pound indeed, 356.8g!

Capture.JPG