On Byres

From Page 52 Footnote 335 of Luigi Lanzi’s notebooks edited by Donata Levi:

“Regarding James Byres, a Scottish resident in Rome, Winckelmann mentions his observations on the theater of Taormina (WINCKELMANN 1830-1834, V, 451-452) and also mentions him (about the trochus) as the owner of a gem, a carnelian with Discobolus (ibid., V, 472), which is often mentioned in contemporary antiquarian literature (for example in GUATTANI, I, February 1784, xiii, and in VISCONTI 1782-1807, I [1782], 95, fig. 7 [SIC! actually fig.6] of plate A): Byres “can boast of having in this carving one of the most elegant and beautiful figures, which have ever been carved in gems”.

He is also mentioned in LANZI, Notizie, 56, [another ref.] as the owner of an Etruscan patera. Byres was also preparing a description of the paintings of an Etruscan hypogeum of Tarquinia with copper plates. For information on him see HAWCROFT 1988, passim: he was in Rome from 1756, at first as a painter with interests also in the field of architecture, but since the mid-1760s he was active especially as a merchant and guide. He participated in important affairs, such as the sale of what is now called the Portland vase to Sir W. Hamilton and the Seven Sacraments of Poussin to the Duke of Rutland. He was one of the first visitors to Paestum in 1766 and left Rome in 1790. See also JENKINS SLOAN 1996, 196, for an onyx cameo with bacchanal, which he sold to Lord Fortrose, Seaforth, before 1781. Byres also acted as an agent on the commission for the altarpiece that Mengs was to have made for All Souls College, Oxford (see ROETTGEN 1993, 30). On Byres see also SKINNER 1966, esp. 16-17, FORD 1974 and STAINTON 1974” (a cleaned up machine translation)

More on Byres in Facos 2018

Social War Overstrike?!

Checking third proofs, esp. for legibility of images…. fig. 3.21 is HN Italy 407, Italia, 90–89 BCE, denarius, 3.97 grams, ANS 1944.100.873.

The image reproduction of the coin isn’t great (YET!) so I was looking to see if it could be improved in some way as the ANS images are exceptionally hi res. I noticed some funny features. Circled above. Red could just be the helmet and Blue could be damage, but …

I wanted to compare it to an image of the same coin struck by the same dies. Thanks Campana. But I cannot find an image quickly. Boo. So now I need to get back to the proofs.

Imitation with interesting punch marks

I find myself getting more interested in the punch marks / test punches / counter marks seen on some RR specimens. And this is just a fascinating article by Gazdac and colleagues. Can’t wait to see the full details of the hoard when that comes out. I’m especially interested in learning more about the methods used for the Metallurgical testing, particularly the investigation of pre existing ‘minute cracks’ though non-destructive techniques to compare surface and interior readings.

Woman and Funeral Pyre

“Terracotta lid of a sarcophagus showing a corpse being carried to the pyre; found near Torre dei Conti (near Rome). 3rd century CE Rome: Capitoline Museum. Credits: Ann Raia, 2005” Source.

The representation of the woman (behind?) The pyre reminded me of representations of the Tarpeia.

Slightly higher res detail from arachne.dainst.org/entity/1215685. Identified there as representing Meleager Myth and dated late 2nd Cent. CE.

Evil Eye Gem(s?)

Thinking about the evil eye in Roman culture for some lesson planning last night and this am. I came across these two impressions of ancient intaglios. One is said to have been taken in the 18th century in the Florentine Museum. The other is reported as taken from the Sammlung Stosch, W Cl VII 0127 = Staatliche Museen, Antikensammlung Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland, Inv.-Nr. FG 9722. The Florentine is said to be cut from the root of emerald. The Berlin intaglio is catalogued as a glass paste. Was the Berlin glasspaste made from the Florentine gem? Is the Florentine intaglio really another glass paste (I’m not sure what root of emerald means) made from the same mold as the Berlin example? Were glass pastes ever made as ‘fakes’ in the early modern period? Could the Berlin version be such?

Beazley archive image
Arachne image

A round up other evil eye iconography:

https://sarahemilybond.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/5105670024_aa06ccb4b7_z.jpg
Mosaic from the House of the Evil Eye, Antioch, Syria. Via Sarah Bond’s Blog.
Detail of mosaic in Capitoline Museum found in Villa Casali (1889) inscribed: INTRANTIBUS HIC DEOS PROPITIOS ET BASILIC(AE) HILARIANAE. Arachne entry.
“An #apotropaic carving, Leptis Magna, Libya. A potent protective image: a centaur with a large phallus, phallic nose and trident, aided by a bird, snake and scorpion, attacks an ‘evil eye’. The meaning of MAL ER is debated” via Twitter. The Arachne entry says it is from the theatre at Homs, Libya.
Another example from Leptis Magna. Arachne entry.

Not a “brothel sign” but another example of an apotropaic carving from Leptis Magna.

Pendant in John Hopkins Museum. CF. BM 1814,0704.1172.
From Farone 2013
From Same.
Also called the Woburn relief and said to be in Woburn Abbey collection. From Same.

Nora Hoard – a possible votive deposit of Romano-Campanan coins from Sardinia

Deposited c. 230-225 BCE

Just reading Gorini’s admirable write up! V nice to have an archaeological context! I agree with his historical framing and lean strongly to his interpretation of it as possibly votive but not likely constitutionally foundational in anyway.

Giovanni Gorini’s A new hoard of Romano-Campanian coins from Nora (Sardinia) , in Studies in ancient coinage in honour of Andrew Burnett, R.Bland, D.Calomino eds. London 2015, pp. 31- 40

Note to self: Discussed in Jaia and Molinari 2020/2021 “The Carbognano Hoard” citing

Bonetto J., Falezza G. 2009, Scenari di romanizzazione a Nora: un deposito di fondazione e un deposito votivo per la costituzione della Provincia Sardinia et Corsica, «Sardinia Corsica et Baleares Antiquae», VII, 81-100.