Engraving Coins, Post-Striking

The Etruscan Necropolis of Poggio del Sole in Arezzo revealed in the late 19th century in controlled excavations an engrave Roman semis weighing 18.4 grams. The engraving is with an Etruscan name, likely a coin deposited with the deceased. Interestingly great care seems to have been taken not to obscure or deface the iconography of the coin.

The letters on the obverse begin beneath the head of Jupiter, curve around in front of it to a point above the head, and reveal the following name:

The letters on the reverse present greater difficulty; the first begins at the *acrostolion* (the curved prow ornament) of the ship, and they proceed from right to left:

This was read VE CRIVEPE AREVIZIES and pulled into Latin as Velius Crivepius Arevissii [filius]. Then the next year it was re read as Criuepeue Areuizies with the assertion that the first was the name of a lautni or freedman and the second was the name of the patron/master and of Celtic/Gallic origin. I find the proposed comparanda less than convincing in this second piece, but onomastics are not my specialty. I’m satisfied that it is all one name and that it is Etruscan and that the function was likely sepulcheral.

I’d dearly love to share a photo of this coin but know of none thus far. I wonder if it is in the Arezzo museum. I must visit next year. For the most part I agree with the interpretation:

The incising of an Etruscan personal name on a Roman *semis*, while entirely novel, is consistent with the customs of the time. In addition to marking the urn that held the deceased’s body and ashes, such inscriptions were sometimes found on objects that had belonged to the individual or had been deposited by grieving relatives in accordance with ritual practice. This served not only to clearly distinguish—within the same tomb—which items belonged to the deceased, but also to ensure that the objects (especially those of everyday use) would not be employed by the living. To this end, the word *SVTHINA* (“sepulchral”) was inscribed across the polished surface of mirrors from Volsinii; weapons and vessels were frequently broken; and the practice of depositing *aes rude* continued into the third century BC, even when coinage bearing official markings was already in use. I have even observed that, in the first century, *asses* of the uncial standard were snapped in two to prevent them from re-entering circulation. A truly rare example has also come down to us: a *sextantal as* bearing the inscription *FORTUNAI STIPE* (B. d’Ailly, *Recherches sur la monnaie rep.*, pl. LIV, p. 12), indicating that the coin was part of a *stips* (offering) dedicated to Fortuna—perhaps intended for the construction of a temple in her honor. Similarly, by examining the countermarks found on coins of the Roman Republic—most of which remain indecipherable—we may reasonably surmise that some represent marks associated with sacred offerings or with pooled funds collected for a specific purpose.

This and above machine translations of Gamurrini RIN 1891

I particularly like the idea that aes rude was preferred specifically for ritual purposes, cf. Praeneste practices. And I want to know more about this halving of asses in grave goods. The countermarks meant are likely bankers marks and those I’d connect to test cuts probably in conjunction with the legislation of Gratidianus and the Lex Cornelia. I’ve got a co-authored article that touches on that, but still awaiting proofs – so cannot share yet.

More on the Fortunai Stipe coin and parallels in an earlier post.

This BM mirror with the SVOINA inscription is said to be from Chiusi. The MET has a cista without findspot with the same type of inscription on both lid and body. And the Louvre has a nice collection of similarly inscribed objects. One from Diffendale’s photos from Naples.

I wonder if some less that ethical individuals added the inscription to artifacts to raise their value through the application of a ‘unique’ ‘authentic’ feature… I wish I was not so suspicious.

No. I’ve not formatted that bibliography yet… Why do you ask…

Classic Researchastination. Or is it procrasti-posting?

Advice on Detecting Forgeries, c. 1891

I took a break between trying to do some professional travel planning and some bibliographical formatting–none of these tasks spark joy, but must be done. I decided to read something fun and share:

Counterfeit Roman Bronzes. Unfortunately, the file on forgeries must always remain open. Modern industry is constantly refining itself and devising new ways to deceive collectors. Today, we intend to discuss Roman bronzes in order to warn collectors of this series, as the coin-forging industry in Rome has reached an incredible level of perfection. Everyone knows how difficult it is to forge bronze coins for two reasons—the patina and the edge—features that are nearly impossible to replicate authentically. However, in Rome, they do not manufacture fake coins from scratch; instead, they take genuine coins and restrike them using a counterfeit die, impressing the design of a rare coin onto a common one. The edge remains perfectly preserved and appears genuine—as it truly is—even to the most expert eye. The patina, or at least the coin’s ancient coloring, also remains unaltered. To identify these restruck coins, one must look for an unusual sheen in the background areas and, conversely, a certain roughness on the raised parts of the design, particularly the lettering. The metal undergoes immense pressure during this double striking, creating the glossy background; the roughness of the relief details arises because the metal—sometimes depleted by the original striking—fails to fully fill the new die.

We have seen medium bronzes, large bronzes, and even a medallion produced using this method, and we consider it a service to warn all collectors about this extremely dangerous type of forgery. When rare or extremely rare coins are offered to you, if you wish to avoid being deceived, you should begin by being wary; furthermore, rather than relying on the authenticity of the rim or the patina—which, incidentally, can be quite skillfully faked nowadays—you should carefully examine both the flat field of the coin and its highest relief areas. One can never be too cautious.

Counterfeit Roman gold coins are also in circulation, but these are more easily recognized.

RIN 1891 p. 413-414, machine translation

Wouldn’t you love to see one of these re strikes just to get a sense of what they look like?! If you know of one and want to send me pictures I’d love that. I wonder if they mean gold is counterfeited the same way? This type of modern restrike seems something different, closer to what Becker might have been attempting?! [If we believe he did not mean to deceive.]

All of this is a good argument about why archaeometallurgy can help, but cannot prove authenticity.

A point I’ve made on this blog before:


Flashbacks

Sept 1 isn’t a big day for posting in the past. All I have is some random RR bibliography. I’m very frustrated these days with the lack of digital modernization in numismatic literature. Lots of my publications aren’t indexed by google scholar and don’t count towards any citation metrics and fundamentally get cites less because of it. I could manually enter them but a) boring and b) would it help people access them?! Also Donum has great data but doesn’t have it formatted to populate correctly in Zotero or similar software, and the INC bibliographies are now online but as PDFs not as an actual searchable database. All of this means I spend more time hunting and hand formatting when I work with coin than I do for other subfields. I tend not to care too much about metrics of productivity but I do care about being read and I’m hearing from scholars that those metrics matter a great deal at some institutions and that I have colleagues moving away from publishing in the discipline in order to actually achieve promotion and institutional recognition.

Back to my loathsome formatting.

Social War Hoards

Here’s Campana’s record of the hoards

He does not include NSc 1884 224 regarding RRCH 223. Moiano. Whereas Crawford thought it might include Social War coins.

Machine translation.

[discovery of tombs described] …Many years ago, a hoard of Consular and Samnite coins, weapons, and various objects was found there; from time to time, many decorated vases were also recovered from the tombs—which were attributed to Sant’Agata dei Goti, as the nearest town to that site. It should also be noted, as many writers affirm, that the ancient city of Saticula must have stood not far away. … Among the objects found in the past on the aforementioned property, I possess the following bronze coin (25 mm in diameter): a male head facing right, with two small dots behind it (indicating a *sextans*); on the reverse, an elephant standing to the left with a bird above it. This coin, of uncertain attribution, shares the same crude style as the one described by the distinguished Minervini, to which it bears a strong resemblance. Sambon describes similar pieces. …

I think it likely the type under discussion is this one typically dated to the second punic war and the time of Hannibal.

Meles Historia Numorum Italy 442, cf. BM specimen (w/o photo), specimen above said by Haeberlin to be in Naples (30.5g.). Typically the object on top of the elephant is identified as a rider/driver but I see how it could be seen as a bird. [link to plate with more examples] Likewise the head is identified with Hercules because a club can be made out between the dots over the far shoulder. We assume the Punic silver struck in Iberia was the model:

I wish I could be confident that the mention of “un ripostiglio di monete consolari e saunitiche” meant this was a social war hoard with social war denarii, but it doesn’t even say it was a silver hoard. If it contained a bronze of Meles than perhaps all the coins were bronze. Boo.

NSc 1893, 441 for CHRR 269. Roccamandolfi.

A cache of silver family coins discovered in the municipality. As early as November 1888, a clay vase containing a large cache of silver family coins was discovered on a farm called Scirno, owned by Mr. Francesco Martelli, in the Roccamandolfi area. The cache was seized by the judicial authorities for administrative reasons, and only now are we able to provide a description of the find. The coins, according to the catalog compiled by the Royal Inspector of the excavations, Cav. De Marco, are 337 and belong to the following families: Aburia 2. Aelia 2. Aemilia 2. Antestia 4. Antonia 16. Appuleia 1. Aurelia 1. Baebia 2. Caecilia 5. Calidia 2. Calpurnia 21. Cassia 2. Cipia 1. Claudia 2. Coelia 2. Cornelia 14. Cosconia 2. Crepusia 11. Curiatia 1. Curtia 2. Domitia 2. Fabia 3. Fannia 4. Flaminia 4. Fonteia 14. Fulvia 1. Furia 12. Herennia 2. Iulia 9. Iunia 16. Licinia 17. Lutatia 1. Maenia 5. Mamilia 3. Manlia 5. Marcia 12. Memmia 4. Minucia 2. Naevia 3. Opeimia 4. Papiria 4. Pinaria 4. Plautia 1. Poblicia 1. Pompeia 1. Porcia 6. Postumia 4. Procilia 2. Quintia 1. Rubria 10. Saufeia 1. Sempronia 1. Sergia 3. Servilia 8. Silia 3. Sulpicia 1. Thoria 6. Titia 8. Tituria 11. Valeria 6. Vargunteia 2. Vibia 16. There are also four uncertain denarii and a Samnite coin from the time of the Marsica League, on which only the number IIIV is visible. Nine other unmarked or poorly preserved family coins were also part of the same hoard.

I’m at least re assured that it is possible to call social war coins Samnite because of this “una moneta sannitica, del tempo della lega Marsica”.

The control numeral means that the coin is almost certainly HN Italy 415 with head of Italia, l. [no legend or I] and Oath scene with eight figures = Campana 3a/35-37.

The picture seems pretty clear. The odd coin survived in the hoards but most were gone from circulation by 79 BCE. There exclusion from the hoards might have something to do with the Lex Cornelia… [Which I think likely re affirmed ideas put forward by Gratidianus: with Alice Sharpless and Kris Lockyear I’ve got a piece on this for which I’m awaiting proofs.]

Am I missing hoards? If so, please let me know. I chased after a possible one in Romania but decided in the end it was a red herring.

I found this cool bibliographical resource on the Social War more generally.


Flashback

In 2022 I found an amusing vase painting where men in Thracian costume reminded me of Roman apices. I cited a drawing not the vase itself, but it was easy to find. This vase has a man in a similar costume.

In 2018 I was playing around with how to visually depict the usage of control marks and serration on the RR coin series. It was the day I broke 50k on the book manuscript. The timelines ended up combined in the book and then took on new life as I thought about these things as I worked on RRDP. See Carbone and Yarrow RBN 2020: 298-299 for a much more detailed chart on the use of control marks and my discussion of the phenomenon.

In 2016 I have no idea what I was working on, perhaps the book but not with an eye to the final version, perhaps this was when I was trying to decide what to do with my manuscript. I was certainly having a day deep in both secondary literature and the primary sources. I know this was about the time I was finishing the first draft of the Romulus’ Apotheosis article, but that doesn’t seem to connect to these posts:


Warm Up Writing

Harry Judge told me it was ok to be an academic and a Christian while I was kicking around Brasenose College as a grad student. He was one of the few fellows who regularly came to chapel and perhaps the most irreverent. He introduced me to the idea of Markian Christianity. Just embrace Mark, Baptism to the Empty Tomb. Leave Q and Gnosticism to the others and you’ll be fine. I sat on bench in the old Quad this past May dedicated to Harry and said a little pray and ask for forgiveness I never stayed in touch. I confessed to another fellow, from another college, this one ordained, my struggles with faith. She gave me two gems. If I struggled with Paul, I should teach the letters and look for the humanity of the man, the divine inspiration in tension with cultural and social norms. She said not to fetishize the early church, originalism is a theological error, when Jesus taught change and a striving towards a better future where we move towards greater equality.

I still struggle with these questions, but I try and it was good to go to church yesterday and light a candle or two and be moved by the simple act of communion. It helped move the grief a little more. In a different more raw and wordless way than writing. I meditated on Joseph the Worker. So patient and steadfast in the face of complex and unknowable forces. And then today I saw this meme and I thought of Harry, and Charlie telling me to embrace my love of the church.

Sitting in the pew with my grief I remembered a little more. He would make my stuffed animals dance around my bed to Camille Saint-Saëns’ carnival of the animals. I had no ear but he wanted me to be comfortable with classical music. There was also Peter and Wolf, but I loved Saint-Saëns more. In my teen years he ensured I got to go to Evita and Madame Butterfly, getting all dressed up and experiencing ‘real’ theatre with ‘real’ music. There was a cracked window dedicated to St. Cecilia about the candles in the left hand aisle of the nave. The crack does not erase the meaning. Our earthy lives are fragile.


Our pattern of life is changing. I’m working from home more and my beloved is out on job sites with his clients long hours. We got a bimonthly cleaner. It helps. She’s the first time we’ve had a cleaner I don’t mind in my personal space. The rest I tolerated a time or two and then let go. I can’t tell you why this one is different. I wish I could have her every week or even more.

At home I’m doing more primary-carer parenting. The kids say they don’t want cell phones if I’m in charge of tech. I’m too strict. I wonder if I am. The intertubes tell me that being strict leads to sneaking. This I know. I’ve been realizing that my concerns over tech is not in any way phone specific. Phones are really just one more device in a tech ecosystem in which they and we as a family are deeply enmeshed. I’ve got to figure out a balance.

On Saturday I did a little work and thought I might blog. I re-read an old blog post, one of those ‘look back posts’ about where I was a year ago, “… Just Email”. It helped me remember the constant struggle for self discipline. So I went for a walk and then worked on bibliography. I got really excited when I saw Donum (ANS library catalogue) connected to Zotero and I decided to again try Zotero for bibliography. Nope. Donum puts articles in as books and leaves out the details so now I get to relook up all the details to manually enter coin article data. These are the moments I wish I had a research assistant I could pay to do the grunt work. I think I will leave Zotero installed. It does a nice job with most other bibliographical databases. I wonder if the INC bibliographies are uploaded into it or can be downloaded into it with the correct formatting… Now that is a thought!

Spartacus and RRC 394

RRC 394/1

It is super weird to me that I’ve never written a blog post about this coin, at least not one the search function on my blog will spit out. I’ve been posting for 13 years and this very common coin has not yet crossed my desk in a way that generated a post. I tried to bribe my kids to make an index of my blog based on Crawford numbers over the summer. They are to rich to be interested in the copy and pasting work at the rates I offered. Maybe I’ll find someone else I can pay to do that for me at some point. It would be interesting to see the other gaps.

I didn’t even illustrate it in my 2021 book. That was probably a mistake. Perhaps there will be a second edition in which I can correct it. I’d slip it into chapter 3 on Mutinies to talk about the impact of Spartacus’ revolt and to thus contextualize the Social War.

Here’s what Lockyear 2007: 159 says that inspired this post:

You see those two little lines in the marginalia. That tells you I had this thought when I read the book cover to cover at some point before I started this blog. This is the sort of little nugget that has such a hard time being translated from technical publications into the mainstream of historical research.

I did however annotate my hard copy of RRC with Lockyear’s insights. On p. 164 he connects it to Pompey’s threatened return from Spain for lack of funds, but notes p. 166 that it was not distributed to Spain in any significant numbers.

If we put it in 73 BCE as part of the regularly striking for the year we need not be surprised that more coins were struck this year. There were multiple stressors that year among those not already mentioned Mithridates agitation in Asia.

Crawford rightly points to the use of Diana on other Postumii issues (RRC 335 and 372).

I will therefore reply first to Postumus, who somehow or other, though only a candidate for the praetorship, seems to me in his assault on a consul like a circus-horse competing in the four-horse-chariot race. In his case, if his rivals did nothing wrong, his retirement from the contest showed a sense of their superiority ; if on the other hand any of them spent money on the contest, Postumus must be a very desirable friend, to be following up an injury to a friend before resenting one received by himself.

Cic. Mur. 57

if one of the counsel for the prosecution, our friend Postumus, went to welcome Murena with quite a large number of supporters, is there anything to cause astonishment in that huge crowd ? I say nothing of his clients, neighbours, and fellow-tribesmen, or of the whole army of Lucullus, which had arrived about that time to attend the triumph : I merely assert this, that the voluntary service of giving a man an imposing reception has never failed to be rendered to any man who deserved it, nor even to any one who desired it.

Ibid. 69

I am more concerned than Crawford about how to resolve the AT/TA ligature. We resolve it elsewhere on the series as Tatius. I’ve got no better answer for its appearance on this coin. One cannot turn the ligature into a version of Albinus as far as I can see.

Finally I’d note the hunting spear has clear dots along the shaft. An unusual feature to my eye.

Something New for the Year Ahead


As a proud union member my workload is strictly monitored and controlled. It’s going to shock you (not really) that I’m too far overwork load in this cycle. This means I’m going to have extra time this year to focus on research and writing. It is not a sabbatical, but it is a reset to get a better balance. I also get to some behind the scenes service projects and future focused work to support the incredibly leadership of my fellow classicist and blogger, Joel Christensen, Provost of the GC. It is a year of transition for me. One in which I get to think about the great ‘what next’ question.

I realized when I created that link to Joel’s blog why I chose the template for mine that I did. I was looking at a refresh to my website yesterday. I was tempted by the author landing page style rather than leading with the blog, but nah. No time for design stuff.


Flash Back!

In 2019 I was thinking about a quaestor who didn’t want to strike coins for Pompey but did anyway, leaving off his name only to be outed by the survival of a key Cicero letter. I last updated this post just two weeks ago.

In 2020 the pandemic was still in the first long grind and we were hopeful things were starting to open up again even without a vaccine. Twitter was my lifeline and I was smart enough to archive some of the conversations here because most have disappeared. On this day I was curious at the stylistic similarities between Parthenon horses and horses on early Roman coins.

Maybe I’ll do more of this retrospective this year. maybe not.


Stuff that Needs Attention

Travel Related

October

  • Illinois presentation – rent car, slide deck
  • Warsaw presentation – slide deck, figure out if I fit in Krakow too
  • Invitation to China – follow up on logistics to assess feasibility and financials

December

  • MuX experiment – buy plane tickets

January

  • Warwick gig – figure out if the kids are coming
Publication Related
  • Review goals and priorities, as well as approaches to writing
  • Papius, Fabatus catalogue and write up – consider a pomodoro approach to limit research-astination (there has got to be a better neologism for this concept, perhaps in German?!)
  • Social War Abstract and Bibliography
  • Edits to Dio on Crassus article
  • Edits to Mars article
  • Engage with RRC 25 collaborative article
  • Decide what to do with the recent draft pieces on Musa and Cicero’s Letters
  • Get serious about book projects
  • Say no to other new projects, unless grant related

The Man who Raised Me

I got the text late on Sunday night. I told myself not to think of it and just sleep.

I said the words aloud on Monday, but only the anger at the means of letting me know and the timing. Is there ever a good way? A good time?

I threw myself into my novels to escape.

I read the obituary. I raged at the erasure, the inaccuracies.

I stuffed my feelings down.

I slept and slept. rinse, repeat.

My head still aches. But not like my heart.

This morning I was filling out a permission slip for a field trip and my kid was tell me how much they didn’t want to go. The tears started. My beloved said, ‘parenting is hard.’ Thinking it was the conflict. All I could say was “no, it was that Sunday night text.”

I told myself there was no point in writing. It was a complicated, but ordinary life. My grief is my own and no one else’s. It’s messy. But, write I must. Just for me.

I was five or so when I met him, another of my mother’s boyfriends. He made her crepes. She was impressed. His furniture matched. So modern, so nice. Not a futon on the floor, not hand-me-downs. I remember his apartment. It wasn’t in a basement, like ours. It had big glass French doors. He said he remembered dancing with my mom at a sober holiday party when her belly was big with me. He said he remembered waving us off in our red Volkswagen square-back when I was two and my mom went off to find herself on the road and on the Left Coast.

I don’t know if any of this is true. He would lie to make the past better. Or, if a lie would not work, he’d walk away.

There were two wives before my mom. The first a shotgun marriage to make his son legit. We called him Yanni. Because James was too hard. He was named for the uncle, his father’s older brother, who died in Vietnam of an overdose. Listed as drowning, I was told, as he vomited in his helmet. The second was a short lived romp with Miss Fergus Falls, runner up for Miss Minnesota.

Again, is any of this true? I don’t know.

My mom was third. Common law only. She would never sign a damn thing or trust anyone. Not completely.

He wanted so badly to be middle class, a better life. He knew you had to walk the walk, talk the talk, and look the part for anyone to ever take you seriously. Look like a yuppy and be a yuppy. He taught my mom how to dress for a job interview. He supported her finishing her college degree. As a new family we took a caretaker position for a property owned by his employer in order to save enough money for a house. A real home in a good neighborhood. A responsible choice.

My mom was furious the day he came home with a Thunderbird, because he wouldn’t drive a beat-up Volkswagen one day longer, even if my mom could rebuild that engine one more time. He’d never asked: he knew what she would say.

He was a coward with women. He loved them strong and exciting, all the better if they were petite and dark-haired. He barely touched his family of origin in those years. His ‘crazy’ catholic mother in the garbage house. The drunk of a dad who walked out of the crazy, and was dead before 70. The younger siblings who were so strung out they passed out in the soup one Thanksgiving. It wasn’t a lack of love, but a deep fear the same demons would eat him up. The bare bones of this are true, I saw it for myself, even the soup. I think he wanted a strong woman who would make it all right.

He brushed my hair so tenderly. He’d made a great story out of his failure in making me edible oatmeal when left in charge. He told his friends my mom’s cute kid stories about me, as if they were his own experiences. They weren’t, but I knew he did it to claim me as his own. He told me it was OK if I loved church, even if my mom didn’t approve. I think that was the only time he ever directly contradicted her to me. One year he picked me up from Christmas midnight mass and saw a woman at bus stop waiting in knee deep snow. He stopped and we took her home. No question asked, just the right thing to do. When we saw a terrible accident and I was worried about the hit pedestrian, he made all the phone calls to the police and hospitals to help reassure me of the outcome. I don’t care if he lied about that. It was what I needed.

After my mom got her degree and a good union job with the county, he found a MBA program that would take his work experience, instead of a college degree. He only ever had a GED before that, but he was one hell of a good non-profit manager, usually healthcare adjacent. He worked his ass off for that MBA nights and weekends at a large oak roll-top desk.

Another purchase he didn’t ask my mom about, but loved (and, yes, also left behind).

Like the music equipment.

I can hear him playing Blackbird on his acoustic guitar for me. The saddest, most beautiful sound I know. I never loved his synthesizer compositions, but he did and I have no ear. So perhaps they were beautiful too, because they gave him joy. He taught himself carpentry and build a case in the dining room for the speakers and records and stereo he loved so much. Chicago and ELO I remember best.

My mother encouraged the carpentry; it reminded her of her grandfather – the making, the do-it-yourself home projects. He built all the cabinets in the bathroom. He learned to tile too. The wallpaper never lined up and the wood stain was a little too orange. He wanted everything new, not old. He was ready with a can of spray paint to treat any antique lamp, much to my mother’s horror. He polished an old glass Santa ornament, a family heirloom of my mom’s, and made it a nice new noose(!) to hang it on the tree. Again I hear my mother mad, but laughing too. I still hang it by that noose each year on my tree.

The T-bird went the way of such things and was replaced by TWO brand new (yet very sensible) Honda Civics, right off the lot. A wagon for my mom and CRX for him. The Christmases weren’t just a make-do affair anymore–one year there was even a three speed bicycle with my name on it under the tree. He brought home a laptop as soon as a laptop existed, so I could write my papers on it rather than the typewriter. On hot summer days with no AC, he would make root beer floats in the unfinished basement and we’d play scrabble or put together a puzzle or backgammon ( I don’t remember how to play but he taught me) or gin rummy.

His son Yanni got into some trouble. My mom insisted we do the right thing and give him a second chance. They turned the attic into a second floor loft space, so we could have a third bedroom. Some contractors, but mostly their own sweat and tears. Then, for a while, I had a brother, not just every other weekend, but all the time. He was fun and funny and tall and protective and a very very lost soul. Yanni last called me in 2008; he was drunk. He’d just gotten off the phone with my mom. He was missing his dad who he had just learned had remarried for the 6th (and last?) time without letting him know.

I found out Yanni was dead too in that same Sunday text. Two gut punches. I can’t think about Yanni yet. I’ve not even looked for his obit.

Where did it all go wrong? Was it ever right?

I remember the yelling more from my age 14. From 15 I think I remember them both having a beer behind the others back. Each said the other was the worse alcoholic and I shouldn’t tell the other parent about the occasional drinking. It was just one beer or may be two. He liked Moosehead. She liked Sierra Nevada. A relationship predicated on sobriety could not survive this. Yet, they also wanted very different things. Once they got past just surviving to thriving, the dreams no longer matched, regardless of the love. They were really, really good together at those first steps out of poverty. It gave me a chance for something different, my own.

They told me they were splitting up when I went to college. I knew the marriage wasn’t good. I loved him so. I wrote my senior speech about finding the father I never had in him. Even after all the shitty things I said to him in my teenage angsty years.

He promised I got to keep him. He was signing the house over to me and my mom free and clear. He sent me lifesavers my freshman year of college with a hundred dollars inserted in the hole between the candies. And, he stayed calm and consistent as my mom dropped to 90 pounds and took up smoking in her grief. I lost a part of her in that divorce too.

Then there was the Christmas eve, really the wee hours Christmas morning, I bailed him out of Jail from a DWI. He didn’t call me. He called my mom. She wouldn’t go, said I shouldn’t. I did.

When I went to Oxford for study abroad, he bought me a brand new leather jacket, modern and well cut to replace the tattered and painted one I’d worn for years. Before grad school, He threw me one hell of a going-away party at his downtown loft apartment. He was always willing to let me use that apartment and the roof deck with friends to play at being a grown up.

I felt so special he kept momentos of me. I knew he never kept anything. When he was done with something, the past was over. I cannot imagine how Yanni felt.

Or, the wives.

I lasted through two more of those.

Rosemary was in toastmasters, had a house in the suburbs with two perfectly groomed and well breed dogs. He shifted his whole existence and tastes to match hers. I was so happy to be at that wedding. The house and way of life were strange, but I was welcome. They even took me on a vacation to a resort (no more tents in this new reality).

Then back to the downtown loft.

Then his ex-secretary Diane. They opened a restaurant –her dream, not his — but he was all-in each time. It failed. She called me overseas to let me know the day she kicked him out for his drinking. I valued that call: it made me feel like family. I’d learned that year I really couldn’t tell if he was in a blackout. He’d seem so normal as we watched a movie and yet remember nothing the next morning. He came to visit me in Oxford. I got him a guest room in college. He drank too much. I couldn’t feel connected.

He went to treatment. He decided he wasn’t an alcoholic, just bipolar. If he found the right meds, he’d be able to manage the booze. Yes, this is another lie he told himself.

He asked my mom to let him move back in. Just until he was back on his feet. I begged them both not to do it. If they had changed, it was not in ways that made them more compatible, even as roommates. The yelling was so awful that summer. He cut off his finger while trying to repair something. I drove him to the hospital. Of course, there were painkillers. I went back to England.

He left.

He left everything behind.

Even me.

I saw him once more. Winter 2003. He’d moved to Bismark, ND by then. His one functional sister was there and she’d moved their mom into a home there. He’d got a job. I drove to Fargo and so did he. We had lunch in a truck stop. I drove home across the frozen plains in car I’d borrowed from my grandfather. The civic wagon was now too old to make that drive.

I got one Christmas card at my mom’s house from him. I think. I don’t really remember.

Whenever I looked on the internet for him, I found nothing. It was like he vanished. I always feared he was dead.

Until Sunday when I got the text. And, now, I know.

Too late for any funeral. I must make my own memorial.

I don’t know who he was the last two decades. In my heart he will always be my Charlie. The man who raised me, who made so much possible.

But for others he was Chuck or Chaz or Charles. And there were so many lies too. Some to ease the pain of a hurtful past, some to enlarge the good.

Even so.

I know he made me feel safe and loved. And, I know there is a hole the shape of a father inside of me.

A father I lost long ago but grieve today.


The photo album I made him in 1998 was one of the things he left behind when he left my mother’s house a second time. I’m glad I have it today and Robert Frost’s words hit different, but I wish so dearly he had kept it close. I wish he’d been able to remember all those beautiful days.

“Get my travel funds from Moneta”

I was consulting an old blog post for another footnote and noticed this funny command from Cicero to get money from Moneta to let him take a reasonable sum with him as he travels to join Pompey.

I of course went first to Shackleton Bailey’s commentary which pointed me to his fanciful restoration of Att. 15.15 with another reference to Moneta and the idea that the temple served as a bank.

Luckily Woytek 2003 has sensible things to say correcting this view and others.

I still feel I’m not positive that I understand what is going on in the passage. First we need to remember that Philotimus is deeply in debt to Cicero, cf. Att. 7.3.7 Dec 50. So it may be a statement that he needs to pay up at whatever inconvenience be it divine intervention or extortionate usury. I think this is my preferred explanation.

“I don’t care your debtors aren’t pay up, Pray to Moneta, As I will extract mine from you come hell or high water”

Another possibility is that Cicero has some thought of taking fresh coin in some official capacity granted or presumed to have been granted by Pompey or the consuls etc. Pompey withdraws from the area of Rome in late January. The consuls sail to Greece 4 March, Pompey 17 March. Caesar summons a senate meeting on the outskirts of Rome 1 April and shortly there after before leaves for Spain. In the interim he seized the public treasury. For dates and sources see Attalus

Many had spoken in favour of a massacre: and Caesar himself was not by nature and inclination averse to cruelty, but he thought that mild measures would win popularity. But, if he lost popular favour, he would be cruel. He had been put out when he found that he had offended the populace itself by seizing the treasury: and so, though he had fully made up his mind to harangue the people before leaving, he had not ventured to do so, and he had gone off in a very disturbed state of mind

Att. 10.4.8

So there was still coined money to be had from the government, but this seems more outlandish an explanation as the viaticus (travel fund) is clearly personal.

Below is the last Pompeian issue struck by the Roman mint before they left the city and eventually Italy.

After Caesar’s arrival another Moneyer begins striking on his behalf at the Roman Mint:

In this chronology I follow Woytek 2003: 95ff.

And for fun notice the graffiti on both obverses in the field to the front of head, the second coin is in the form of ‘speaking lines’ . I thought I had a post on this but my searches are coming up empty.

Sulla and Delphi

For another footnote I wanted to remind myself of the primary sources on this episode.

Basically I’m thinking about ready cash vs. income and wealth derived from real estate.

Plutarch, Life of Sulla 12

ἔγραψε δὲ καὶ τοῖς Ἀμφικτύοσιν εἰς Δελφοὺς ὅτι τὰ χρήματα τοῦ θεοῦ βέλτιον εἴη κομισθῆναι πρὸς αὐτόν· ἢ γὰρ φυλάξειν ἀσφαλέστερον ἢ καὶ ἀποχρησάμενος ἀποδώσειν οὐκ ἐλάττω· καὶ τῶν φίλων ἀπέστειλε Κάφιν τὸν Φωκέα κελεύσας σταθμῷ παραλαβεῖν ἕκαστον. ὁ δὲ Κάφις ἧκε μὲν εἰς Δελφούς, ὤκνει δὲ τῶν ἱερῶν θιγεῖν, καὶ πολλὰ τῶν Ἀμφικτυόνων παρόντων ἀπεδάκρυσε τὴν ἀνάγκην. 5ἐνίων δὲ φασκόντων ἀκοῦσαι φθεγγομένης τῆς ἐν τοῖς ἀνακτόροις κιθάρας, εἴτε πιστεύσας εἴτε τὸν Σύλλαν βουλόμενος ἐμβαλεῖν εἰς δεισιδαιμονίαν, ἐπέστειλε πρὸς αὐτόν. ὁ δὲ σκώπτων ἀντέγραψε θαυμάζειν τὸν Κάφιν, εἰ μὴ συνίησιν ὅτι χαίροντος, οὐ χαλεπαίνοντος, εἴη τὸ ᾄδειν· ὥστε θαρροῦντα λαμβάνειν ἐκέλευσεν, ὡς ἡδομένου τοῦ θεοῦ καὶ διδόντος. Τὰ μὲν οὖν ἄλλα διέλαθε τούς γε πολλοὺς Ἕλληνας ἐκπεμπόμενα, τὸν δὲ ἀργυροῦν πίθον, ὃς ἦν ὑπόλοιπος ἔτι τῶν βασιλικῶν, διὰ βάρος καὶ μέγεθος οὐ δυναμένων ἀναλαβεῖν τῶν ὑποζυγίων, ἀναγκαζόμενοι κατακόπτειν οἱ Ἀμφικτύονες εἰς μνήμην ἐβάλοντο τοῦτο μὲν Τίτον Φλαμινῖνον καὶ Μάνιον Ἀκύλιον, τοῦτο δὲ Αἰμίλιον Παῦλον, ὧν ὁ μὲν Ἀντίοχον ἐξελάσας τῆς Ἑλλάδος, οἱ δὲ τοὺς Μακεδόνων βασιλεῖς καταπολεμήσαντες οὐ μόνον ἀπέσχοντο τῶν ἱερῶν τῶν Ἑλληνικῶν, ἀλλὰ καὶ δῶρα καὶ τιμὴν αὐτοῖς καὶ σεμνότητα πολλὴν προσέθεσαν. 7ἀλλ᾿ ἐκεῖνοι μὲν ἀνδρῶν τε σωφρόνων καὶ μεμαθηκότων σιωπῇ τοῖς ἄρχουσι παρέχειν τὰς χεῖρας ἡγούμενοι κατὰ νόμον, αὐτοί τε ταῖς ψυχαῖς βασιλικοὶ καὶ ταῖς δαπάναις εὐτελεῖς ὄντες, μετρίοις ἐχρῶντο καὶ τεταγμένοις ἀναλώμασι, τὸ κολακεύειν τοὺς στρατιώτας αἴσχιον 8ἡγούμενοι τοῦ δεδιέναι τοὺς πολεμίους· οἱ δὲ τότε στρατηγοὶ βίᾳ τὸ πρωτεῖον, οὐκ ἀρετῇ, κτώμενοι, καὶ μᾶλλον ἐπ᾿ ἀλλήλους δεόμενοι τῶν ὅπλων ἢ τοὺς πολεμίους, ἠναγκάζοντο δημαγωγεῖν ἐν τῷ στρατηγεῖν, εἶθ᾿ ὧν εἰς τὰς ἡδυπαθείας τοῖς στρατευομένοις ἀνήλισκον ὠνούμενοι τοὺς πόνους αὐτῶν, ἔλαθον ὤνιον ὅλην τὴν πατρίδα ποιήσαντες ἑαυτούς τε δούλους τῶν κακίστων ἐπὶ τῷ τῶν βελτιόνων ἄρχειν.

He wrote also to the Amphictyons at Delphi that it was better to have the treasures of the god sent to him; for he would either keep them more safely, or, if he spent them, would restore as much. And he sent Caphis, the Phocian, one of his friends, with the letter, bidding him receive each article by weight. Caphis came to Delphi, but was loth to touch the sacred objects, and shed many tears, in the presence of the Amphictyons, over the necessity of it. And when some of them declared they heard the sound of the god’s lyre in the inner sanctuary, Caphis, either because he believed them, or because he wished to strike Sulla with superstitious fear, sent word to him about it. But Sulla wrote back jocosely, expressing his amazement that Caphis did not understand that singing was done in joy, not anger; his orders were therefore to take boldly, assured that the god was willing and glad to give. Accordingly, the rest of the treasures were sent away without the knowledge of the most, certainly, of the Greeks; but the silver jar, the only one of the royal gifts which still remained, was too large and heavy for any beast of burden to carry, and the Amphictyons were compelled to cut it into pieces. As they did so, they called to mind now Titus Flamininus and Manius Acilius, and now Aemilius Paulus, of whom one had driven Antiochus out of Greece, and the others had subdued in war the kings of Macedonia; these had not only spared the sanctuaries of the Greeks, but had even made additional gifts to them, and greatly increased their honour and dignity. But these were lawful commanders of men who were self-restrained and had learned to serve their leaders without a murmur, and they were themselves kingly in spirit and simple in their personal expenses, and indulged in moderate and specified public expenditures, deeming it more disgraceful to flatter their soldiers than to fear their enemies; the generals of this later time, however, who won their primacy by force, not merit, and who needed their armies for service against one another, rather than against the public enemy, were compelled to merge the general in the demagogue, and then, by purchasing the services of their soldiers with lavish sums to be spent on luxurious living, they unwittingly made their whole country a thing for sale, and themselves slaves of the basest men for the sake of ruling over the better.

Pausanias, Boeotia 7.5-6

Σύλλα δὲ ἐσβαλόντος ἐς τὴν Βοιωτίαν δεῖμα ἔσχε τοὺς Θηβαίους, καὶ ἐγνωσιμάχησάν τε αὐτίκα καὶ ἐτράποντο αὖθις ἐς τὴν Ῥωμαίων φιλίαν. Σύλλας δὲ ἐς αὐτοὺς ἐχρῆτο ὅμως τῷ θυμῷ, καὶ ἄλλα τε ἐξεῦρεν ἐπὶ λύμῃ τῶν Θηβαίων καὶ τὴν ἡμίσειαν ἀπετέμετο αὐτῶν τῆς χώρας κατὰ πρόφασιν τοιαύτην. ἡνίκα ἤρχετο τοῦ πρὸς Μιθριδάτην πολέμου, χρῃμάτων ἐσπάνιζε· συνέλεξεν οὖν ἔκ τε Ὀλυμπίας ἀναθήματα καὶ τὰ ἐξ Ἐπιδαύρου καὶ τὰ ἐκ Δελφῶν, ὁπόσα ὑπελίποντο οἱ Φωκεῖς· ταῦτα μὲν δὴ διένειμε τῇ στρατιᾷ, τοῖς θεοῖς δὲ ἀντέδωκεν ἀντὶ τῶν χρημάτων γῆς τὴν ἡμίσειαν τῆς Θηβαΐδος. τὴν μὲν δὴ ἀφαίρετον χώραν ὕστερον Ῥωμαίων χάριτι ἀνεσώσαντο οἱ Θηβαῖοι, τὰ δὲ ἄλλα ἐς τὸ ἀσθενέστατον ἀπ᾿ ἐκείνου προήχθησαν·

when Sulla invaded Boeotia, terror seized the Thebans; they at once changed sides, and sought the friendship of the Romans. Sulla nevertheless was angry with them, and among his plans to humble them was to cut away one half of their territory. His pretext was as follows. When he began the war against Mithridates, he was short of funds. So he collected offerings from Olympia, those at Epidaurus, and all those at Delphi that had been left by the Phocians, These he divided among his soldiery, and repaid the gods with half of the Theban territory. Although by favour of the Romans the Thebans afterwards recovered the land of which they had been deprived, yet from this point they sank into the greatest depths of weakness.

Frontinus Stratagems 1.11

(Cf. Val. Max. i. ii, also mentioned Delphi as the source of the Apollo figurine; 3; Plut. Sulla 29)

L. Sulla, quo paratiorem militem ad pugnandum haberet, praedici sibi a diis futura simulavit. Postremo etiam in conspectu exercitus, priusquam in aciem descenderet, signum modicae amplitudinis, quod Delphis sustulerat, orabat petebatque, promissam victoriam maturaret.

Lucius Sulla, in order to make his soldiers readier for combat, pretended that the future was foretold him by the gods. His last act, before engaging in battle, was to pray, in the sight of his army, to a small image which he had taken from Delphi, entreating it to speed the promised victory.

Diodorus 38/39.7

Here’s the passage I was remembering (from my doctorate!)

Ὅτι ὁ Σύλλας χρημάτων ἀπορούμενος ἐπέβαλε τὰς χεῖρας τρισὶν ἱεροῖς, ἐν οἷς ἀναθημάτων ἀργυρῶν τε καὶ χρυσῶν πλῆθος ἦν, ἐν μὲν Δελφοῖς τῷ Ἀπόλλωνι καθιερωμένα,ἐν Ἐπιδαύρῳ δὲ τῷ Ἀσκληπιῷ, ἐν Ὀλυμπίᾳ δὲ τῷ Διί. πλεῖστα δὲ ἔλαβεν ἐξ Ὀλυμπίας διὰ τὸ μεμενηκέναι τὸ ἱερὸν τοῦτο ἄσυλον ἐξ αἰῶνος· τῶν γὰρ ἐν Δελφοῖς χρημάτων Φωκεῖς τὰ πλεῖστα διεφόρησαν ἐν τῷ ἱερῷ κληθέντι πολέμῳ. ὁ δὲ Σύλλας πολὺν ἄργυρον καὶ χρυσόν, ἔτι δὲ τὴν ἄλλην πολυτελῆ κατασκευὴν ἀναλαβὼν ἤθροισε χρημάτων πλῆθος πρὸς τοὺς ἐν Ἰταλίᾳ προσδοκωμένους πολέμους. ἀδεισιδαιμόνως δὲ τῇ λήψει τῶν ἱερῶν χρημάτων προσενεχθεὶς χώραν ἀντὶ τούτων καθιέρωσε τοῖς θεοῖς εἰς τὰς κατ᾿ ἔτος προσόδους. εὐτραπελευόμενος δὲ ἀπεφαίνετο κρατεῖν τῷ πολέμῳ πάντως διὰ τὸ τοὺς θεοὺς αὐτῷ συνεργεῖν, εἰσενηνοχότας χρημάτων πολύ τι πλῆθος αὐτῷ.

Sulla, being in need of money, laid hands on three sanctuaries that possessed a wealth of offerings in gold and silver: those consecrated to Apollo at Delphi, to Asclepius at Epidaurus, and to Zeus at Olympia.His largest haul was at Olympia, since that sanctuary had remained inviolate through the ages, whereas most of the treasures at Delphi had been plundered by the Phocians during the so-called “Sacred War.” Sulla, by appropriating large amounts of gold and silver, and any other objects of value, amassed ample funds for the anticipated war in Italy. And though he showed no scruples in seizing the sacred treasures, in their stead he did consecrate land to the gods to provide them an annual revenue. He would say in jest that his supremacy in battle was assured, since the gods, by their large contributions to his war chest, were aiding his cause.

Just for eye candy:

Sullan gold struck at Athens (RRC 359/1), perhaps in part with confiscated temple gold? See Suspene et al. in AVREVS for recent testing. BnF specimen

Contextualizing the Coins of the First Italia

The two pupils on this head creep me out.

I promised to write something on the social war coinage within the next 12 months. I’m not engaged in the work now but wanted to keep this reference handy and have a place for similar future notes.

There is one chapter on coins but the whole is very relevant:

Pittia, Sylvie, et Loredana Cappelletti, éd. L’Italie entre déchirement et réconciliation : la guerre sociale (91-88 avant notre ère) et ses lendemains. Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté, 2024. doi:10.4000/139nk.

If you want to see all the social war coinage, your best bet is IRIS populated with the BnF specimens and with Rutter’s citations for the few they don’t have.

More to come. Back to my lit survey for the article I’m working on.


Next Day.

A colleague sent this note:

“Apropos Italia:, see the latest thinking by Crawford in ImIt I, 2011, pp. 67-74”

So I re read it. Most know but the standard work is.

I would sorely love a physical copy of this for my library but that is a pipe dream. I went looking for a copy of Crawford’s Roman Statutes yesterday and struck out for anything less than 2-3k. By heavens, Crawford is really the mind of last 100 years.

My other stray thoughts after a quick skim are that the Oscan legend uses something very like the apex, a diacritic mark I discussed fairly recently in Latin. And it has vowel reduplication for long vowels (cf. earlier post with classic example). The orthography, or writing culture, of the Italians was clearly part of the same cultural world as that of literate Latin. No surprise but exciting nonetheless to observe.


Bompois, Ferdinand. Les Types Monétaires de La Guerre Sociale. Paris, 1873.

Pansa, Giovanni. 1910. La Monetazione Degli Italici Durante La Guerra Sociale Nel Suo Valore Storico e Nel Carattere Simbolico. Rivista Italiana di Numismatica 23: 303-331 with plates 5-6.

Bes defaced?! (RRC 266/3)

I was fixing broken links and images in this old post and I had to take a look at the bes or 2/3s coin = 8 unciae (RRC 266/3). When I see an old post is getting traffic, I will try if I can to check it is still working and correct what I can.

This led me to notice that the Tübingen and BNF specimens of this rare bronze type have a similar cut on the face of Bacchus. Similarly placed as well, but not exact. I suspect they may even have been made with the same tool.

Why cut the face of a bronze?! It cannot be plated or faked in that way. And it wouldn’t be mistaken for worn Roman silver with a weight of between 10-12 grams.

Is it to cancel it? Is it because the moneyer’s name is associated with Brutus and murder of Julius Caesar? Some other reason did it need to cancelled or counter-marked in some way?

Here’s the nicest specimen know:

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-11.png