The reverse of this coin (RRC 298/1) represents the Lares Praestites based on the description of their cult image in Ovid (see also Plutarch). Earlier in Ovid’s same work he gives a pretty horrible account of their conception. Lara or Lala warns Juturna of Jupiter’s amorous advances and is punished by having her tongue ripped out and then, while be lead to the underworld, she is raped by Mercury and conceives divine twins. Wiseman and Coarelli have connected this narrative with a famous mid-forth century mirror:
Obviously, the Bolsena mirror looks A LOT like what what we think the Romulus and Remus narrative should look like, BUT with many strange surrounding figures who our Romulus and Remus narrative can’t explain. Wiseman used the mirror to show that iconography of the wolf and twins wasn’t exclusively linked to Romulus and Remus. Coarelli took Wiseman’s argument further and suggests that these guardian Lares were originally founders of Rome themselves before being supplanted in traditional narratives by Romulus and Remus. Wiseman is confident that this early didrachm (RRC 20/1; c.269 see Burnett 2006 for redating) is a representation of Romulus and Remus:
And so is pretty much everyone else in the world. But Coarelli has a fairly interesting point about borrowing of the iconography of one myth to create a new one. That sort of shift isn’t instantaneous. So if the Lares Praestites were originally the twins beneath the wolf, when would audiences have stopped seeing them as such? Could the didrachm be ‘misread’? Could the coin up top from 112-11 BC be taken to depict Rome’s founders? Ovid’s poem suggests their cult was neglected in his day, but this moneyer certainly thought they were worthy of commemoration. Farney sees the representation as a claim to divine ancestry explaining the little head of Vulcan as an allusion to the paternity of Caeculus, the founder of Praeneste. Caeculus’ uncles could be understood to be these Lares. But, Lott wants to see the Vulcan image to mean that these Lares protect the city from fire…
On Bolsena Mirror:
[…] there are the other republican coins (RRC 39/3 and 235/1) and that mirror we discussed ages ago that should be brought into the discussion but I’ll leave it there for […]
[…] No mention of the Dioscuri here. Just a visual description. One that in fact sounds awfully like that which we see on this coin representing the Lares Praestites (early post): […]
[…] By the same poetic logic as this above (Romulus – Indiges) in Silius Italicus, Punica 9.294 the suggestion is that the Indigetes include Faunus, Quirinus and Castor and Pollux. This reminds me of the composition of the Bolsena mirror! […]