98 of 234: Money issues in the early 80s BCE, preliminaries

Main points. A brain dump. 91 BCE – Drusus is said to have mixed bronze with the silver as plebeian tribune. Still, even after testing by drilling, there is no evidence this is true for the denarii of these years. The Plinian tradition(s) want to cast Drusus as greedy and a liar, the historiographer in… Continue reading 98 of 234: Money issues in the early 80s BCE, preliminaries

Belgammel Ram

Ridiculously excited to read this well illustrated article on the Belgammel Ram, esp. because of how different the metallurgical profile is from preliminary tests of the Egadi Rams.  LOW LEAD only 8%. Adams, J.R., Antoniadou, A., Hunt, C.O., Bennett, P., Croudace, I.W., Taylor, R.N., Pearce, R.B., Earl, G.P., Flemming, N.C., Moggeridge, J., Whiteside, T., Oliver,… Continue reading Belgammel Ram

Some Habits at SE Italian Mints? Signing Quaestors and Overstriking?

This post is hot on the heels of the last.  There is a lot going on in the numismatic world of SE Italy during the Hannibalic War.  I wish I had a copy of Marchetti’s Histoire économique et monétaire de la deuxième querre punique (1975) to hand.  I can’t let go my concerns about the CA series… Continue reading Some Habits at SE Italian Mints? Signing Quaestors and Overstriking?

Representing the Defeated Enemy, or the Appropriation of Symbols

First a little context: To my mind one of the most interesting aspects of the secondary marks on the early denarius, victoriatus and related issues is when they begin to experiment with different types of secondary symbols.  Most of the secondary symbols that appear on the coinage of the Hannibal War had already been in use… Continue reading Representing the Defeated Enemy, or the Appropriation of Symbols